I've been reading Kurt Busiek's third volume of
Avengers. I grew up with the first iteration (#s 1–402) which ended, rather bathetically, in the "Onslaught" campaign (September 1996). How symbolic –– thirty-three years of
Avengers (and
Fantastic Four) continuity wiped in a mediocre , nebulous X-Men super-saga. Nobody cared. I feel like absolutely everybody started dating beautiful women around that time and lost all interest in comics for the next ten or so years. I know I did.
Volume Three came hot on the heels of that glorious reboot implosion, the silly shit fest that was Volume Two, which lasted a full year and twelve issues only and ended in grievous mortal riotous shame for all concerned.
Volume Three resumed the continuity pretty much as it had been before wunderkind blunderer
Rob Liefeld Franklin Richards had fudged the brand with childish bravado. It had writing by journeyman extraordinary Kurt Busiek that was pretty okay –– at least it was respectful of continuity. You got George Perez drawing it and then Alan Davis. Busiek was if anything a bit of a continuity nerd–Nazi amalgam. Which is a good thing in principle,
vide Gruenwald, if not always practice (I tried rereading
Avengers Forever recently, which I remembered enjoying, and found it passing boring for the same reasons as I lay out below).
Quite dull going though, partially because of Busiek's wearisome interest in that tortuous and interminable triangle Vision–Scarlet Witch–Wonder Man. The poor android VISION –– how he bleats like a human male. The Young Werther seems like Frank Castle in comparison. Throw in Hank Pym and Ultron and their [JOHNNY ROTTEN voice here]
endlessly rewarding father-son relationship and you have an awful vortex of Roy Thomas–inspired dulness.
As for Wonder Man, conceived solely as an inversion of Wonder Woman –– a buh-
rilliant legal coup, snatching the copyright on the name before before DC thought of it –– even as a fierce defender of the Englehart/Milgrom run on
West Coast Avengers I am hard pushed to explain him. Wonder Man, so named because you wonder why he's here.
Several good writers have come a cropper on the
pons asinorum that is the Vision. You ever read that Jonathan Lethem short story about the Vision? Ha. My mother-in-law gave me a Vision bobble-head one Christmas –– that and the Lethem story are the best two things ever to happen involving the Vision. Sad indictment when Jonathan Lethem and my mother-in-law come up with your best moments.
Roy Thomas, that dreadful awful poor bad writer, that
rascal, created Vision out of the patent hard-on he had for Golden Age comics.
"Take me back to those dreamy days before Mort Weisinger bullied me in the DC offices."
Ooh, is the Vision the original Human Torch?
Can it be possible?!
Set a spell and let RASCALLY ROY inflict some more gone-but-not-forgotten (by me!) shit upon you, like... the Liberty Legion! Or is Vision driven by the brainwaves of Wonder Man? Is the Grim Reaper his brother? They are always fighting. Is the Whizzer the Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver's real father? DULL STUFF IN EACH CASE but begad successive writers on the tile love to return to it.
These exhausted questions still hang around like a pungent corpse at the banquet. Dick Remender, when he was burnt out and spazzing urgently and writing badly for a living, revisited the Scarlet Witch / Quicksilver family tree project and rather pointlessly retconned it so that Magneto was now
not their father –– again. Although in fairness, perhaps he was
robustly compelled to write that by the Disney lawyers for reasons pertaining to the film rights to Pietro & Wanda. I think Mark Waid, who should know better, is wading through this dull matter even as we speak. Reinvigorating the moribund. The Disney lawyers must have their way.
I say, "Even as we speak," but we're not speaking. I'm writing, and you are –– you are
not reading this. Nobody is.
Who cares! I'll continue. Steve Englehart did a stand-up Christlike good job on two limited series of
Vision & Scarlet Witch, and then for a while he wrought lilies from the acorn. On
West Coast Avengers he had that inspired twist with the twin baby sons of Vision and Scarlet Witch being revealed to be demonic shells, evil illusions of life sucked up to become the hands of Mister Pandemonium.
But even the great STEVE fell too far in
sentimental love with the minutiae of the Wanda/Vizh myth –– just like he did with his achilles heel, Mantis. Steve had a Pynchonesque crush on Mantis, like Claremont did with Kitty and Storm (––and Rogue ––and Psylocke), and so kept force-feeding us Mantis well past her expiry date. Like Dan Slott does with the sexy Allred girl in the new run of
Silver Surfer. Can Slott be taken off Silver Surfer so that the cute girl ("Dawn Greenwood") can be retconned and we can move on? Slott is a bad one for nursing awful crushes on his characters.
In my revisiting of the third volume of Avengers, I hit a wall of dulness with a supremely unnecessary one-shot about Ultron written variously by Roger Stern, Steve Englehart, Busiek and (who else) Rascally Roy. Divers hands make a poor fist! This one-shot (ironically called
The Ultron Imperative –– since nothing about it is "imperative") is a hopeless affair but a crystal-clear indictment of what is wrong with Ultron.
Robots, like demons, are nebulous.
"Oh we have to fight hundreds of robot versions of ourselves."
"Oh they have made robot amalgams of us."
(SEE: another boring trend, the
amalgam: The Super-Adaptoid, The Super Skrull, DC's Amazo and the so-called Composite Superman.)
Good issues with Ultron:
Secret Wars, when Galactus snuffs him out like a candle.
Daredevil by Ann Nocenti and JR Jr, an Acts of Vengeance tie-in that revolved around the incongruity of Daredevil fighting Ultron. I believe the Inhumans wandered in and managed not to plumb
Roy Thomas–level dullness as well. This is because Ann Nocenti is a good writer and JR Jr. was drawing well at the time, not yet high on the fumes of his own raging ego.
West Coast Avengers by Englehart, Milgrom & Sinnott. The "dream team" mentioned in a previous post. I can't remember what exactly they did with boring Ultron but I feel like it was quite good.
The recent film was an all round bad fudge sundae. Red Reddington = Ultron? This was about as riveting as an episode of
The Blacklist can be. Also, the damp flatus that was the "Age of Ultron" round robin circle jerk. Wolverine and Sue Storm stumbling through realities. More mismanagement of time and future outcomes. The only characters who should mess with the weave of the time-space continuum are:
Kang/Immortus
Zaarko (see –– possibly exclusively –– Dan Jurgen's superb run on
Thor [Volume Three] where maybe five real-time years of the comic took place in a future that was eventually cancelled)
The Time Variance Authority (led by Mark Gruenwald)
The Time Keepers / Time Twisters
In DC there are more legitimate time travelers; it can be
Brainiac 5 & the orange alien with a beak and big eyes in the original
Legion continuity
Time Trapper
Glorith
Per Degaton
Chronos
Hourman
Rip Hunter (not the shitty TV version NB)
Booster Gold
Black Beetle
All these characters have been involved in interesting time travel stories. Per Degaton is particularly interesting, since DC had a running joke that he would always try to divert from the same moment, and always return to that moment, with the same lines of dialogue &c. The Time Trapper/Superboy/
pocket universe storyline and then the Glorith/Time Trapper universes in Legion are also exemplary cases of how willfully
complex comics can get and still be good.